Xnet contribueix al projecte de Carta dels Drets i Deures Digitals del Departament de Pol\u00edtiques Digitals i Administraci\u00f3 P\u00fablica del Govern de la Generalitat de Catalunya.
\nConsiderem que \u00e9s un projecte encertat i molt rellevant per crear un marc legislatiu democr\u00e0tic en l’era digital.
\nContribuirem en diversos aspectes, des dels continguts als processos participatius.<\/p>\n
Aqu\u00ed deixem const\u00e0ncia del material que lliurarem perqu\u00e8 s’integri en la primera fase de redacci\u00f3.<\/p>\n
En primer lloc, compartim i volem refor\u00e7ar l’enfocament proposat que considera que no s’ha de caure en el perill de la “segregaci\u00f3” quan es parla de drets digitals. L’espai digital no ha de ser un lloc d\u2019 “estat d’excepci\u00f3”, sin\u00f3 que aqu\u00ed han de regnar els drets i llibertats b\u00e0siques fonamentals tan i com a l’espai f\u00edsic.<\/p>\n
Per aix\u00f2, els nostres primers textos proposats s\u00f3n els textos de refer\u00e8ncia dels drets humans per a la seva aplicaci\u00f3 a l’espai digital – sovint posada en perill – com a pedra angular i cor de la Carta.
\nLa separaci\u00f3 en “digital” ha de servir justament perqu\u00e8 es presti especial atenci\u00f3 a aquest \u00e0mbit i no per separar-los de la lluita general per a la democr\u00e0cia, sempre en col\u00b7laboraci\u00f3 i solidaritat amb les lluites de tots els altres \u00e0mbits.<\/p>\n
En segon lloc aportarem informaci\u00f3 espec\u00edfica de les din\u00e0miques pr\u00f2pies de l’espai digital, per refor\u00e7ar-les i tamb\u00e9 perqu\u00e8 aquestes puguin enriquir i actualitzar la idea de drets fonamentals tradicionals. En aquest sentit ens adherirem tamb\u00e9 a les valuoses aportacions, des de la hist\u00f2ria de la Xarxa fins avui dia, que aportar\u00e0 Artur Serra i el seu grup, i a les d’altres participants.<\/p>\n
Finalment, un primer breu recull de sent\u00e8ncies del Tribunal Europeu de Drets Humans de refer\u00e8ncia per a la defensa dels drets en \u00e0mbit digital.<\/p>\n
Agra\u00efm a Joe McNamee, Niels ten Oever, Nani Jansen Reventlow per l’ajuda a recopilar i analitzar aquest material.<\/p>\n
Concloem dient que la lluita pels drets \u00e9s un lluita permanent i cont\u00ednuament in progress, aix\u00ed que aquesta llista sempre ser\u00e0 modificable i actualitzable.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
DOCUMENTS B\u00c0SICS EN L’ENFOCAMENT COM DRETS HUMANS ESPEC\u00cdFICS DE L’ESPAI PROPI D’INTERNET O DIGITAL – Marco Civil do Internet (2009-2014) CARTES DE DRETS DIGITALS DE REFER\u00c8NCIA Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) -Manilla Principles\u00a0 (2015) Association for Progressive Communications (APC) – Internet Rights Charter (2006) Internet Rights and Principles Dynamic Coalition – The Charter of Human Rights and Principles for the Internet (2015) Association for Progressive Communication (APC) -Feminist Internet Principles (agosto de 2016) TEXTOS DE REFER\u00c8NCIA DE XNET I FCFORUM (2009-2015) TAMB\u00c9 APORTAREM SIS DOCUMENTS M\u00c9S A TENIR EN COMPTE PERQU\u00c8 EXISTEIXEN, PER\u00d2 AMB BIAIXOS, AIX\u00cd QUE LES CONSIDEREM A DESCARTAR SENT\u00c8NCIES DEL TRIBUNAL EUROPEU DE DRETS HUMANS (aportacions de Nani Jansen Reventlow)<\/p>\n No criminal defamation liability for hyperlinking:\u00a0 No website blocking: See also: Cengiz and others v. Turkey (http:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-158948<\/a>) and Akdeniz v. Turkey (http:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-142383<\/a>) Guidance on content moderation: No blanket interception of communications: <\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" .@X_net_ contribueix a la Carta dels Drets i Deures Digitals del Departament de Pol\u00edtiques Digitals i Administraci\u00f3 P\u00fablica del Govern de la Generalitat de Catalunya<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":15,"featured_media":16484,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[52],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-16466","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-blog","ejes-neutralidad-de-la-red","ejes-luchas-por-las-libertades-civiles","servicios-recomendaciones-de-politicas"],"yoast_head":"\n
\nUniversal Declaration of Human Rights (1948)
\nhttps:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Universal_Declaration_of_Human_Rights<\/a>\u00a0
\n\u00a0
\nInternet Society – Internet and Human Rights Resource Centre (2018)
\nhttps:\/\/www.internetsociety.org\/issues\/humanrights\/<\/a>
\n\u00a0
\nAsamblea General de las Naciones Unidas – Promoci\u00f3n, protecci\u00f3n y disfrute de los derechos humanos enInternet (2016)
\nhttp:\/\/ap.ohchr.org\/documents\/S\/HRC\/d_res_dec\/A_HRC_32_L20.pdf<\/a>
\n\u00a0
\nInternet Research Task Force – Research into Human Rights Protocol Considerations
\nhttps:\/\/trac.tools.ietf.org\/html\/rfc8280<\/a>
\n\u00a0
\nParlamento y Consejo Europeos – GDPR – Reglamento europeo 2016\/679 del Parlamento y Consejo Europeos (2016)
\nhttps:\/\/eur-lex.europa.eu\/legal-content\/EN\/TXT\/?uri=uriserv%3AOJ.L_.2016.119.01.0001.01.ENG&toc=OJ%3AL%3A2016%3A119%3ATOC<\/a>\u00a0
\n <\/p>\n
\n\u00a0
\nEXPERI\u00c8NCIES \u00daNIQUES
\n– ICANN as a reference in Internet governance, multistakeholders, siempre civil society<\/p>\n
\n\u00a0https:\/\/es.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Marco_Civil_de_Internet<\/a>
\n\u00a0http:\/\/www.planalto.gov.br\/CCIVIL_03\/_Ato2011-2014\/2014\/Lei\/L12965.htm<\/a>
\n <\/p>\n
\nEDRi – The Charter of Digital Rights (2014)
\nhttps:\/\/edri.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/EDRi_DigitalRightsCharter_web.pdf<\/a>
\n\u00a0
\nWe Promise – The Charter (2013)
\nhttps:\/\/www.wepromise.eu\/en\/page\/charter<\/a><\/p>\n
\nhttps:\/\/www.manilaprinciples.org\/<\/a><\/p>\n
\nhttps:\/\/www.apc.org\/en\/pubs\/about-apc\/apc-internet-rights-charter<\/a>
\n\u00a0
\nTransAtlantic Consumer Dialogue (TACD)- Charter of Consumer Rights in the Digital World\u00a0 (2008)
\nhttps:\/\/www.vzbv.de\/charter_consumerrights_digital_world__tacd_2008.pdf<\/a>
\n\u00a0
\nWorld Wide Web Foundation – A Contract for the Web (2019)
\nhttps:\/\/webfoundation.org\/2019\/01\/building-a-contract-for-the-web-next-steps\/<\/a><\/p>\n
\n(Marianne Franklin, Robert Bodle y Dixie Hawtin)
\nhttp:\/\/internetrightsandprinciples.org\/site\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/IRPC_spanish_1stedition_final.pdf<\/a>
\n\u00a0
\nWeb Foundation – Open Data Charter (2015)
\nhttps:\/\/webfoundation.org\/our-work\/projects\/open-data-charter\/<\/a>
\n\u00a0
\nArticle 19 – The Universal Declaration of Digital Rights\u00a0 (2017)
\nhttps:\/\/www.article19.org\/resources\/internetofrights-creating-the-universal-declaration-of-digital-rights\/<\/a>
\n\u00a0
\nUN Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights (2014)
\nhttps:\/\/www.business-humanrights.org\/en\/un-guiding-principles\/implementation-tools-examples\/implementation-by-companies\/by-sector\/information-communications-technology<\/a>
\n\u00a0
\nAlgorithm Watch – Report for Recommendations: automating society (2019)
\nhttps:\/\/algorithmwatch.org\/en\/automating-society-recommendations\/<\/a>
\n\u00a0
\nJosh Cowls y Luciano Floridi – Prolegomena to a White Paper on an Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society (14 de julio de 2018)
\nhttps:\/\/papers.ssrn.com\/sol3\/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3198732<\/a><\/p>\n
\nhttps:\/\/feministinternet.org\/<\/a>
\n <\/p>\n
\nXnet y FCForum\u00a0
\nCartas para la Innovaci\u00f3n la Creatividad y el Acceso al Conocimiento 2.0.1
\nhttps:\/\/fcforum.net\/charter\/<\/a>
\n\u00a0
\nXnet y FCForum \u2013 Modelos sostenibles para la creatividad y la innovaci\u00f3n en la era digital
\nhttps:\/\/fcforum.net\/sustainable-models-for-creativity\/<\/a>
\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0
\nXnet – Neutralidad de la Red
\nhttps:\/\/2015.fcforum.net\/neutralidad-de-la-red\/<\/a>
\nhttps:\/\/xnet-x.net\/eje\/neutralidad-de-la-red<\/a>\/\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0
\n\u00a0
\nXnet y FCForum – Agenda Positiva para el Copyright
\nhttps:\/\/2015.fcforum.net\/agenda-positiva-copyright\/<\/a>
\n <\/p>\n
\n <\/p>\n
\nMagyar Jeti Zrt v. Hungary (http:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-187930<\/a>)
\nRead more:
\nhttps:\/\/strasbourgobservers.com\/2019\/01\/18\/magyar-jeti-zrt-v-hungary-the-court-provides-legal-certainty-for-journalists-that-use-hyperlinks\/<\/a>\u00a0<\/p>\n
\nYildirim v. Turkey (http:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-11540<\/a>)
\nRead more:
\nhttps:\/\/merlin.obs.coe.int\/iris\/2013\/2\/article1.en.html<\/a><\/p>\n
\nThis post discusses how they relate to each other: https:\/\/strasbourgobservers.com\/2016\/01\/05\/cengiz-and-others-v-turkey-a-tentative-victory-for-freedom-of-expression-online\/<\/a><\/p>\n
\nMTE and Index.hu v. Hungary (http:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-160314<\/a>), improving somewhat on Delfi v. Estonia (http:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-155105<\/a>)
\nRead more:
\nhttps:\/\/edri.org\/mte-v-hungary-the-ecthr-rules-again-on-intermediary-liability\/<\/a>
\nand
\nhttps:\/\/inforrm.org\/2016\/02\/07\/case-law-strasbourg-magyar-tartalomszolgaltatok-egyesulete-and-index-hu-zrt-v-hungary-intermediary-liability-again-jonathan-mccully\/<\/a>\u00a0<\/p>\n
\nRoman Zakharov v. Russia (http:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-159324<\/a>)
\nRead more: https:\/\/strasbourgobservers.com\/2015\/12\/23\/case-of-roman-zakharov-v-russia-the-strasbourg-follow-up-to-the-luxembourg-courts-schrems-judgment\/\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n